GeForce2 MX vs Tesla M2050

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1603
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGF100NV11 A2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)28 June 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,699 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448no data
Core clock speed575 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate32.200.7
Floating-point processing power1.03 TFLOPSno data
ROPs482
TMUs564
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB32 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed773 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth148.4 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 28 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

Tesla M2050 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M2050 and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M2050 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce2 MX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Tesla M2050
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Tesla M2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 27 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2050 or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.