Arc A580 vs Tesla C2075

Place in performance ranking	463	85
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.39	39.44
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	no data
GPU code name	GF110	DG2-512
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	25 July 2011 (12 years ago)	10 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price	$2237	$337

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A580 has 10013% better value for money than Tesla C2075.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	3072
Core clock speed	574 MHz	1700 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	247 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.14	384.0
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	248 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3132 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	150.3 GB/s	512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	2.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla C2075 8.71

Arc A580 41.42
+376%

Arc A580 outperforms Tesla C2075 by 376% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla C2075 3364

Arc A580 11584
+244%

Arc A580 outperforms Tesla C2075 by 244% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18−21 −450%	99 +450%
1440p	10−12 −460%	56 +460%
4K	7−8 −414%	36 +414%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −390%	103 +390%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −431%	85 +431%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −393%	130−140 +393%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −425%	80−85 +425%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −394%	85−90 +394%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −386%	100−110 +386%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −410%	107 +410%
Hitman 3	16−18 −431%	85−90 +431%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −440%	189 +440%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −383%	110−120 +383%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −444%	95−100 +444%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −416%	258 +416%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −417%	93 +417%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −378%	86 +378%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −421%	73 +421%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −393%	130−140 +393%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −425%	80−85 +425%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −394%	85−90 +394%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −386%	100−110 +386%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −413%	150−160 +413%
Hitman 3	16−18 −431%	85−90 +431%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −383%	160−170 +383%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −417%	62 +417%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −444%	95−100 +444%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −376%	214 +376%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −397%	174 +397%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −376%	100−105 +376%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −433%	64 +433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −433%	64 +433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −425%	80−85 +425%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −394%	85−90 +394%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −383%	87 +383%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −419%	109 +419%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −406%	177 +406%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −386%	68 +386%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −400%	60 +400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−444%

95−100
+444%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −400%	80−85 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −439%	95−100 +439%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −440%	54 +440%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −410%	51 +410%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −433%	60−65 +433%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −383%	87 +383%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −436%	75 +436%
Hitman 3	10−11 −440%	50−55 +440%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −383%	87 +383%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −406%	91 +406%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −381%	130 +381%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −450%	55 +450%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −422%	47 +422%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−407%

70−75
+407%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −425%	40−45 +425%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Hitman 3	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −430%	50−55 +430%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −388%	39 +388%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −408%	61 +408%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −400%	35 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −400%	30 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −440%	27−30 +440%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −400%	24−27 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −460%	56 +460%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −410%	51 +410%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −420%	52 +420%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −440%	27 +440%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
−429%

35−40

+429%

This is how Tesla C2075 and Arc A580 compete in popular games:

Arc A580 is 450% faster in 1080p
Arc A580 is 460% faster in 1440p
Arc A580 is 414% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.71	41.42
Recency	25 July 2011	10 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	247 Watt	175 Watt