GeForce2 Go vs Tesla C2070

Place in the ranking	581	1582
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.41	0.39
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code name	GF100	NV11 B2
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	25 July 2011 (14 years ago)	11 November 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	no data
Core clock speed	574 MHz	143 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	20 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	238 Watt	2 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.14	0.57
Floating-point processing power	1.028 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	2
TMUs	56	4
L1 Cache	896 KB	no data
L2 Cache	768 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	AGP 4x
Length	248 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	747 MHz	166 MHz
Memory bandwidth	143.4 GB/s	5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI

No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	7.0
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.2
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.0	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Tesla C2070 7.46
+74500%

GeForce2 Go 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla C2070 3120
+77900%

Samples: 13

GeForce2 Go 4
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.46	0.01
Recency	25 July 2011	11 November 2000
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	238 Watt	2 Watt

Tesla C2070 has a 74500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 Go, on the other hand, has 11800% lower power consumption.

The Tesla C2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce2 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla C2070 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce2 Go is a notebook one.