Radeon 680M vs Tesla C2090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated529
Place by popularitynot in top-10074
Power efficiencyno data13.69
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF110Rembrandt+
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speed651 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate41.66105.6
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs6448
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache1 MB256 KB
L2 Cache768 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed924 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 567% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2090 and Radeon 680M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2090 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 680M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 3 votes

Rate Tesla C2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1196 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2090 or Radeon 680M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.