GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs Tesla C2070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking566not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10076
Power efficiency2.39no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF100AD107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4482560
Core clock speed574 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1605 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)238 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14128.4
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS8.218 TFLOPS
ROPs4848
TMUs5680
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache896 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache768 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed747 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.08.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 238 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 4050 Max-Q has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 580% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2070 and GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2070 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Tesla C2070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Tesla C2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 90 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2070 or GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.