Tesla C2070 vs FirePro W4300

Place in performance ranking	497	502
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.62	0.11
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Bonaire	GF100
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 December 2015 (8 years ago)	25 July 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price	$129	$5193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro W4300 has 4100% better value for money than Tesla C2070.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	448
Core clock speed	930 MHz	574 MHz
Number of transistors	2,080 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	238 Watt
Texture fill rate	44.64	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	1,030.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	171 mm	248 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	143.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	no data	2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W4300 7.48
+1.9%

Tesla C2070 7.34

FirePro W4300 outperforms Tesla C2070 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro W4300 2894
+1.9%

Tesla C2070 2839

FirePro W4300 outperforms Tesla C2070 by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.48	7.34
Recency	1 December 2015	25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	238 Watt