Radeon RX 560 896SP vs Tesla X2070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF110Polaris 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)4 July 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512896
Core clock speed651 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1175 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6665.80
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS2.106 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs6456
L1 Cache1 MB224 KB
L2 Cache768 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data170 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed924 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 4 July 2017
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 45 Watt

Tesla X2070 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 560 896SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla X2070 and Radeon RX 560 896SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla X2070 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 560 896SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla X2070
Tesla X2070
AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
Radeon RX 560 896SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Tesla X2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 896SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla X2070 or Radeon RX 560 896SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.