Radeon HD 7770M vs Tesla C2050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4000 4000 Mac Edition 5000 5000 SDI 6000 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070-Q Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7290 7330M 7350M 7370M 7400G 7410M 7420G 7430M 7450A 7450M 7470A 7470M 7490M 7500G 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics 7510M 7520G 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7530M 7550M 7560G IGP 7570M 7590M 7600G 7610M 7620G 7630M 7640G 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7650A 7650M 7650M Rebrand 7660G 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7670A 7670M 7670M Rebrand 7690M 7690M Rebrand 7690M XT 7690M XT Rebrand 7730M 7750M 7770M 7850M 7870M 7950M 7970M 7970M Crossfire 7970M X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla C2050 with Radeon HD 7770M, including specs and performance data.

Tesla C2050
2011
3 GB GDDR5, 238 Watt
7.56
+140%

C2050 outperforms HD 7770M by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla C2050 Tesla C2050
HD 7770M HD 7770M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking569793
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.457.59
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGF100Chelsea
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)24 April 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448512
Core clock speed574 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)238 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate32.1421.60
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs5632
L1 Cache896 KB128 KB
L2 Cache768 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.56 3.15
Recency 25 July 2011 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 238 Watt 32 Watt

Tesla C2050 has a 140% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

HD 7770M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 643.8% lower power consumption.

The Tesla C2050 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla C2050 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7770M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Tesla C2050
AMD Radeon HD 7770M
Radeon HD 7770M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla C2050 Tesla C2050
vs
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
HD 7770M Radeon HD 7770M
vs
GT 750M GeForce GT 750M
Tesla C2050 Tesla C2050
vs
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
Plex 7000 Quadro Plex 7000
vs
R7 350 640SP R7 350 640SP
Plex 7000 Quadro Plex 7000
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q
Plex 7000 Quadro Plex 7000
vs
RTX 4080 RTX 4080
Plex 7000 Quadro Plex 7000
vs
RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4070 SUPER
Plex 7000 Quadro Plex 7000
vs
RTX 5070 SUPER RTX 5070 SUPER
Tesla C2050 Tesla C2050
vs
GRID K140Q GRID K140Q
Tesla C2050 Tesla C2050
vs
FX 5700 FX 5700
Tesla C2050 Tesla C2050
vs
PCX 5900 PCX 5900
Tesla C2050 Tesla C2050
vs
FireStream 9250 FireStream 9250
Tesla C2050 Tesla C2050
vs
UHD Graphics 615 Graphics 615

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 17 votes

Rate Tesla C2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2050 or Radeon HD 7770M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.