RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs Tesla A100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA100AD104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores79367424
Core clock speed1110 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors38,000 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate550.6386.3
Floating-point processing power17.62 gflopsno data
ROPs12880
TMUs496232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount40 GB12 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2400 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 110 Watt

Tesla A100 has a 233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 136.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla A100 and RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla A100 is a workstation card while RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla A100
Tesla A100
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 233 votes

Rate Tesla A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.