HD Graphics 12EU vs Tesla A100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code nameGA100Ironlake
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores793696
Core clock speed1110 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistors38,000 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate550.66.396
Floating-point processing power17.62 TFLOPS0.1023 TFLOPS
ROPs1282
TMUs49612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16QPI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount40 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 35 Watt

Tesla A100 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 12EU, on the other hand, has 642.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla A100 and HD Graphics 12EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla A100 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 12EU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla A100
Tesla A100
Intel HD Graphics 12EU
HD Graphics 12EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 239 votes

Rate Tesla A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 17 votes

Rate HD Graphics 12EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.