A100 SXM4 80 GB vs Tegra K1

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK20AGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)16 November 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1926912
Core clock speed756 MHz1095 MHz
Boost clock speed951 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate7.608609.1
Floating-point processing power0.3652 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs4160
TMUs8432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared80 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1593 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2,039 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLES 3.1N/A
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 400 Watt

Tegra K1 has 4900% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4 80 GB, on the other hand, has a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra K1 and A100 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra K1 is a desktop card while A100 SXM4 80 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra K1
Tegra K1
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 9 votes

Rate Tegra K1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 58 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.