Radeon RX 7900 XT vs Tegra 4 GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated12
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.03
ArchitectureVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTegra 4Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 August 2013 (11 years ago)3 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5376
Core clock speed672 MHz1387 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2394 MHz
Number of transistors11 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate2.688804.4
Floating-point processing powerno data51.48 TFLOPS
ROPs4192
TMUs4336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data800.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLES 3.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2013 3 November 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 300 Watt

Tegra 4 GPU has 1400% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra 4 GPU and Radeon RX 7900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra 4 GPU
Tegra 4 GPU
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 4 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1604 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.