Radeon RX Vega 64 vs TITAN Xp

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1080 Ti GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB TITAN Xp Titan X Pascal TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano Radeon RX Vega Nano Radeon RX Vega XL Radeon RX Vega XT Radeon RX Vega XTX Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN Xp and Radeon RX Vega 64, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN Xp
2017
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
43.47
+37%

TITAN Xp outperforms RX Vega 64 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking67136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.4718.89
Power efficiency13.738.50
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP102Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 April 2017 (7 years ago)7 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX Vega 64 has 51% better value for money than TITAN Xp.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404096
Core clock speed1405 MHz1247 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1546 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate379.7395.8
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPS12.66 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs240256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm279 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XHBM2
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1426 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/s483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN Xp 43.47
+37%
RX Vega 64 31.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN Xp 19424
+36.9%
RX Vega 64 14185

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD150−160
+29.3%
116
−29.3%
1440p100−110
+31.6%
76
−31.6%
4K65−70
+30%
50
−30%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.99
−85.8%
4.30
+85.8%
1440p11.99
−82.6%
6.57
+82.6%
4K18.45
−84.8%
9.98
+84.8%
  • RX Vega 64 has 86% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX Vega 64 has 83% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX Vega 64 has 85% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 161
+0%
161
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+0%
167
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 315
+0%
315
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 146
+0%
146
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 150
+0%
150
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 158
+0%
158
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+0%
132
+0%
Valorant 293
+0%
293
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 128
+0%
128
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+0%
77
+0%
Valorant 140
+0%
140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 263
+0%
263
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+0%
98
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%
Valorant 205
+0%
205
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 66
+0%
66
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how TITAN Xp and RX Vega 64 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN Xp is 29% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN Xp is 32% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN Xp is 30% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 43.47 31.74
Recency 6 April 2017 7 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 295 Watt

TITAN Xp has a 37% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 18% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN Xp is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 64 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
Instinct MI25 AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
vs
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
Tesla V100 PCIe NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe
vs
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
PRO WX 9100 AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
Quadro GP100 NVIDIA Quadro GP100
vs
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
RX Vega 56 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
vs
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
vs
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
GTX 1070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
vs
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
vs
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
Tesla V100 SXM2 NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
vs
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.1 4683 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 765 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN Xp or Radeon RX Vega 64, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.