Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs TITAN Xp

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Plus Graphics 640 Iris Plus Graphics 645 Iris Plus Graphics 650 Iris Plus Graphics 655

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN Xp with Iris Plus Graphics 655, including specs and performance data.

TITAN Xp
2017
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
49.90
+1024%

TITAN Xp outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 655 by a whopping 1024% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking62667
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.66no data
Power efficiency13.9220.64
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP102Coffee Lake GT3e
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 April 2017 (7 years ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840384
Core clock speed1405 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate379.750.40
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPS0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs966
TMUs24048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1426 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN Xp 49.90
+1024%
Iris Plus Graphics 655 4.44

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN Xp 19424
+1023%
Iris Plus Graphics 655 1730

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD210−220
+1005%
19
−1005%
1440p110−120
+1000%
10
−1000%
4K160−170
+967%
15
−967%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.71no data
1440p10.90no data
4K7.49no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+0%
17
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 5
+0%
5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+0%
41
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
World of Tanks 50
+0%
50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+0%
15
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4
+0%
4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4
+0%
4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
World of Tanks 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
World of Tanks 12
+0%
12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 12
+0%
12
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how TITAN Xp and Iris Plus Graphics 655 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN Xp is 1005% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN Xp is 1000% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN Xp is 967% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 49.90 4.44
Recency 6 April 2017 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

TITAN Xp has a 1023.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Plus Graphics 655, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

The TITAN Xp is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics 655 in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN Xp is a desktop card while Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655
vs
GTX 760M GeForce GTX 760M
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
Quadro P4200 GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
vs
RTX 3090 Ti Quadro P4200
Quadro P620 GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
vs
GTX 750 Ti OEM Quadro P620
GTX 1080 Max-Q GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4090 Mobile 4090 Mobile
R9 M375 GeForce GT 730M
vs
GT 730M Radeon R9 M375
9800 GTX+ Radeon HD 6570
vs
HD 6570 GeForce 9800 GTX+
GTX 660 HD Graphics 5300
vs
HD Graphics 5300 GeForce GTX 660
HD Graphics 530 GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
9800 GTX+ HD Graphics 530
HD 7570 Radeon 610M
vs
Radeon 610M Radeon HD 7570
Quadro P400 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB
vs
RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB Quadro P400
RX Vega 56 GeForce MX250
vs
GeForce MX250 Radeon RX Vega 56

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.1 4678 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 340 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 655 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.