UHD Graphics 48EU vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.39no data
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGV100Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2017 (6 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120384
Core clock speed1200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate465.627.60
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS0.8832 TFLOPS
ROPs9612
TMUs32024
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width3072 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed848 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2017 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 45 Watt

UHD Graphics 48EU has an age advantage of 4 years, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 455.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN V and UHD Graphics 48EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 48EU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
Intel UHD Graphics 48EU
UHD Graphics 48EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3284 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 37 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 48EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.