RTX A500 Mobile vs TITAN V

Place in performance ranking	70	321
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	40.26	no data
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GV100	GA107
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	7 December 2017 (6 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	no data
Current price	$228 (0.1x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	2048
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1537 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	465.6	98.37
Floating-point performance	14,899 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on TITAN V and RTX A500 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1696 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	7.0	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	170−180 +183%	60 −183%
1440p	152 +390%	31 −390%
4K	82 +204%	27−30 −204%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	44.32	15.49
Recency	7 December 2017	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	60 Watt