RTX A4000H vs TITAN V

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking80not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.29no data
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGV100GA104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2017 (6 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51206144
Core clock speed1200 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6299.5
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs320192
Tensor Cores640192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA7.08.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2017 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 140 Watt

RTX A4000H has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 78.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN V and RTX A4000H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while RTX A4000H is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
NVIDIA RTX A4000H
RTX A4000H

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3282 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A4000H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.