Quadro RTX A6000 vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A10 PCIe A10G A40 PCIe CMP 90HX Quadro RTX 8100 Quadro RTX 8200 Quadro RTX A6000 A40 A4500 A5000 A5000-12Q A5500

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with Quadro RTX A6000, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
40.64

RTX A6000 outperforms TITAN V by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
TITAN V TITAN V
RTX A6000 RTX A6000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9550
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.23
Power efficiency12.1313.42
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGV100GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)5 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $4,649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

TITAN V and RTX A6000 have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512010752
Core clock speed1200 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6604.8
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS38.71 TFLOPS
ROPs96112
TMUs320336
Tensor Cores640336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB48 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s768.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA7.08.6
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 40.64
RTX A6000 53.96
+32.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
RTX A6000 22741
+32.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
−43.6%
158
+43.6%
1440p152
+23.6%
123
−23.6%
4K82
−29.3%
106
+29.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p27.26
+7.9%
29.42
−7.9%
1440p19.73
+91.6%
37.80
−91.6%
4K36.57
+19.9%
43.86
−19.9%
  • TITAN V has 8% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • TITAN V has 92% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • TITAN V has 20% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Fortnite 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−310
+0%
300−310
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 139
+0%
139
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Fortnite 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 128
+0%
128
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 307
+0%
307
+0%
Valorant 300−310
+0%
300−310
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180
+0%
180
+0%
Valorant 300−310
+0%
300−310
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 96
+0%
96
+0%
Metro Exodus 84
+0%
84
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 155
+0%
155
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 70
+0%
70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+0%
146
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how TITAN V and RTX A6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A6000 is 44% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 24% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A6000 is 29% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 40.64 53.96
Recency 7 December 2017 5 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

TITAN V has 20% lower power consumption.

RTX A6000, on the other hand, has a 32.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX A6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the TITAN V in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
RTX A6000 Quadro RTX A6000
vs
RTX A5000 RTX A5000
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
RTX 3070 Ti RTX 3070 Ti
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 Mobile RTX 3060 Mobile
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 RTX 3060
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 Ti RTX 3060 Ti
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
RX 6800 XT RX 6800 XT
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
Jetson TX2 GPU TX2 GPU
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
RTX A40 RTX A40
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 8 Core GPU
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
RTX A5000 RTX A5000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3323 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 495 votes

Rate Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V or Quadro RTX A6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.