Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs TITAN V
Price now
479$
Games supported
100%
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1200 MHz
- Max video memory 12 GB
- Memory type HBM2
- Memory clock speed 1696 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1470
- Max video memory 8 GB
- Memory type GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 14000
- Maximum resolution
Price now
310$
Games supported
100%
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance rating | 47 | 53 |
| Place by popularity | no data | 13 |
| Value for money | 33.41 | 60.22 |
| Architecture | Volta (2017−2020) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | GV100 | Turing TU106 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 December 2017 (5 years old) | 2 July 2019 (3 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | $399 |
| Current price | $479 (0.2x MSRP) | $310 (0.8x MSRP) |
Value for money
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5120 | 2176 |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1470 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 21,100 million | 10,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 465.6 | 224.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | no data |
Dimensions and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 229 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 3072 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1696 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 651.3 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | + | + |
| G-SYNC support | no data | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.0 | 7.5 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
- GeekBench 5 Vulkan
- GeekBench 5 CUDA
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
TITAN V outperforms GeForce RTX 2060 Super by 3% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
TITAN V outperforms GeForce RTX 2060 Super by 73% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
TITAN V outperforms GeForce RTX 2060 Super by 103% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
TITAN V outperforms GeForce RTX 2060 Super by 89% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of TITAN V and GeForce RTX 2060 Super. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 79 Mh/s | no data |
| Siacoin / SC (Sia) | 3.44 Gh/s | no data |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 1.45 kh/s | no data |
| Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) | 884 Sol/s | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | no data | 126 |
| 1440p | 152
+94.9%
| 78
−94.9%
|
| 4K | 82
+57.7%
| 52
−57.7%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 43.23 | 41.91 |
| Recency | 7 December 2017 | 2 July 2019 |
| Cost | $2999 | $399 |
| Memory bus width | 3072 | 256 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5120 | 2176 |
| Memory bandwidth | 651.3 | 448 |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 175 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of TITAN V by AMD
According to our data, the closest equivalent to TITAN V by AMD is Radeon RX 5700 XT, which is slower by 1% and lower by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to TITAN V:
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2060 Super by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2060 Super from AMD is Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2060 Super:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
