GMA X4500 vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking79not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.29no data
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameGV100Eaglelake
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2017 (6 years ago)1 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512080
Core clock speed1200 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate465.62.132
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPSno data
ROPs964
TMUs3204
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width3072 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed848 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2017 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 12 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 13 Watt

TITAN V has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4500, on the other hand, has 1823.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN V and GMA X4500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
Intel GMA X4500
GMA X4500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3284 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 329 votes

Rate GMA X4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.