ATI FireMV 2200 vs TITAN V

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking82not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.18no data
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)R300 (2005−2008)
GPU code nameGV100RV370
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120no data
Core clock speed1200 MHz324 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,100 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate465.61.296
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPSno data
ROPs964
TMUs3204
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mm170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB128 MB
Memory bus width3072 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz392 MBps
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s3.136 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DMS-59
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

TITAN V has a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireMV 2200, on the other hand, has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN V and FireMV 2200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
ATI FireMV 2200
FireMV 2200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3290 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 6 votes

Rate FireMV 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.