Arc A770 vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc A580 Arc A750 Arc A770 Arc A780

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V and Arc A770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.56
+30.3%

TITAN V outperforms Arc A770 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN V TITAN V
Arc A770 Arc A770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81152
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.00
Power efficiency12.2910.49
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGV100DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V and Arc A770 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204096
Core clock speed1200 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6614.4
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs320256
Tensor Cores640512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA7.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.56
+30.3%
Arc A770 34.21

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+30.2%
Arc A770 13150

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+25%
112
−25%
1440p152
+138%
64
−138%
4K82
+100%
41
−100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p21.42
−629%
2.94
+629%
1440p19.73
−284%
5.14
+284%
4K36.57
−356%
8.02
+356%
  • Arc A770 has 629% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc A770 has 284% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc A770 has 356% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 304
+0%
304
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 120
+0%
120
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 105
+0%
105
+0%
Far Cry 5 71
+0%
71
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 258
+0%
258
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+0%
83
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 216
+0%
216
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
World of Tanks 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 158
+0%
158
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 91
+0%
91
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Dota 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+0%
48
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 89
+0%
89
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how TITAN V and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 25% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 138% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 100% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.56 34.21
Recency 7 December 2017 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 225 Watt

TITAN V has a 30.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
Arc A770 Arc A770
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
H100 PCIe H100 PCIe
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
H100 SXM5 H100 SXM5
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX A5500 RTX A5500
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 4090 Ti GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 4060 Ti GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 4070 Ti GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
A100 PCIe 40 GB A100 PCIe 40 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3295 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5357 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.