UHD Graphics 710 vs Radeon Pro V320

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated811
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.97
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameVega 10Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584128
Core clock speed852 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate336.010.40
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS0.3328 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs2248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed945 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 710 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 1433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V320 and UHD Graphics 710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V320 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 710 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V320
Radeon Pro V320
Intel UHD Graphics 710
UHD Graphics 710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 133 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V320 or UHD Graphics 710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.