Tesla T10 vs TITAN RTX

Place in performance ranking	56	150
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.33	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	TU102	TU102
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	18 December 2018 (5 years ago)	no data
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	no data
Current price	$1035 (0.4x MSRP)	$33

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	4608
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	18,600 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	509.8	449.3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	13 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	672.0 GB/s	624.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 48.84
+49.1%

Tesla T10 32.76

TITAN RTX outperforms Tesla T10 by 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN RTX 18858
+49.1%

Tesla T10 12650

TITAN RTX outperforms Tesla T10 by 49% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	158 +58%	100−110 −58%
1440p	104 +60%	65−70 −60%
4K	76 +52%	50−55 −52%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

110−120

+39.2%

79
−39.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +44.2%	104 −44.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	150−160 +44.2%	104 −44.2%
Battlefield 5	300−310 +43.5%	209 −43.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	210−220 +46.9%	143 −46.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +39.2%	79 −39.2%
Far Cry 5	180−190 +41.7%	127 −41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	290−300 +44.3%	201 −44.3%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +44.4%	187 −44.4%
Hitman 3	170−180 +45.3%	117 −45.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	450−500 +35.5%	332 −35.5%
Metro Exodus	210−220 +45.8%	144 −45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	180−190 +41.7%	127 −41.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	500−550 +42.5%	351 −42.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	160−170 +42.9%	112 −42.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	140−150 +47.4%	95 −47.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +47.7%	88 −47.7%
Battlefield 5	300−310 +47.8%	203 −47.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	190−200 +45%	131 −45%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +39.2%	79 −39.2%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +48.5%	101 −48.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	220−230 +42.9%	154 −42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	350−400 +37.8%	254 −37.8%
Hitman 3	140−150 +48.9%	94 −48.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	500−550 +48.8%	336 −48.8%
Metro Exodus	200−210 +46%	137 −46%
Red Dead Redemption 2	180−190 +42.9%	126 −42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	400−450 +39.9%	286 −39.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	350−400 +31.1%	267 −31.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	300−310 +47.1%	204 −47.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +39.2%	79 −39.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110−120 +37.5%	80 −37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	150−160 +47.1%	102 −47.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +41%	78 −41%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +39.2%	79 −39.2%
Forza Horizon 4	260−270 +48.6%	175 −48.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 +37.6%	218 −37.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	350−400 +44.6%	242 −44.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	200−210 +43.9%	139 −43.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +39.5%	86 −39.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

180−190
+46.3%

123

−46.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	140−150 +42.9%	95−100 −42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	210−220 +45.8%	144 −45.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +48.1%	50−55 −48.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95−100 +43.9%	66 −43.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	180−190 +47.5%	122 −47.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 +43.9%	66 −43.9%
Far Cry 5	190−200 +41.8%	134 −41.8%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +46.5%	157 −46.5%
Hitman 3	140−150 +40%	100 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	250−260 +48.8%	168 −48.8%
Metro Exodus	160−170 +40.4%	114 −40.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	270−280 +47.5%	183 −47.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +42.9%	75−80 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +42.9%	70 −42.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

170−180
+42.9%

119

−42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	130−140 +47.7%	88 −47.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +41.8%	67 −41.8%
Hitman 3	70−75 +45.8%	48 −45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +43.9%	65−70 −43.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 +43.9%	66 −43.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +45.6%	103 −45.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +44.2%	52 −44.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +39.5%	43 −39.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +40%	50 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +36.4%	33 −36.4%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +42.9%	49 −42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +40.4%	114 −40.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +47.1%	102 −47.1%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +46.3%	82 −46.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +39.5%	43 −39.5%