GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla T10

Place in performance ranking	150	253
Place by popularity	not in top-100	2
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	18.89
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	TU102	TU117
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	no data	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149
Current price	$33	$185 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	896
Core clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1665 MHz
Number of transistors	18,600 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	260 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	449.3	93.24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	229 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	13 GB/s	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	624.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla T10 32.76
+60.6%

GTX 1650 20.40

Tesla T10 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla T10 12650
+60.5%

GTX 1650 7880

Tesla T10 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 61% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	110−120 +59.4%	69 −59.4%
1440p	55−60 +48.6%	37 −48.6%
4K	35−40 +59.1%	22 −59.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55
+51.5%

30−35

−51.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +60.4%	53 −60.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 +59.6%	47 −59.6%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +51.9%	79 −51.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +53.8%	52 −53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +51.5%	30−35 −51.5%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +56.3%	64 −56.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +50%	80 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +55.6%	90 −55.6%
Hitman 3	75−80 +53.1%	49 −53.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +56.5%	115 −56.5%
Metro Exodus	160−170 +58.4%	101 −58.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +55.8%	77 −55.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160 +59.6%	94 −59.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +51.8%	56 −51.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +59.6%	47 −59.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +57.1%	35 −57.1%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +52.8%	72 −52.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +52.2%	46 −52.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +51.5%	30−35 −51.5%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +53.8%	52 −53.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +51.8%	56 −51.8%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +49.3%	201 −49.3%
Hitman 3	60−65 +57.9%	38 −57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	400−450 +53.8%	260 −53.8%
Metro Exodus	100−105 +53.8%	65 −53.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 +58.7%	63 −58.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +48.6%	74 −48.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +48.6%	74 −48.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	300−310 +45.6%	206 −45.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +60%	25 −60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +38.5%	13 −38.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +50%	8 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +51.5%	30−35 −51.5%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +53.8%	39 −53.8%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 +53.8%	65 −53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +58.3%	60 −58.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 +53.2%	62 −53.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +54.8%	42 −54.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +42.9%	21 −42.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90
+57.4%

−57.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +54.8%	42 −54.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +60%	50 −60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +50%	18 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +38.5%	13 −38.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +56.3%	32 −56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +53.8%	39 −53.8%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +52.2%	46 −52.2%
Hitman 3	40−45 +48.1%	27 −48.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +51.2%	43 −51.2%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +58.5%	41 −58.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +55.6%	45 −55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +50%	14 −50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+57.1%

−57.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +50%	20 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +58.8%	17 −58.8%
Hitman 3	18−20 +38.5%	13 −38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +52.2%	21−24 −52.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +38.5%	13 −38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +53.8%	26 −53.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +38.5%	13 −38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +60%	5 −60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +50%	12 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +50%	30 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +52.2%	23 −52.2%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +42.9%	21 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +50%	8 −50%