Radeon 8060S vs TITAN RTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN RTX with Radeon 8060S, including specs and performance data.

TITAN RTX
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 280 Watt
45.00
+6.7%

TITAN RTX outperforms 8060S by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8897
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.82no data
Power efficiency12.2458.42
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameTU102Strix Halo
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 December 2018 (6 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46082560
Core clock speed1350 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2335 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8373.6
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS11.96 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs288160
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores7240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN RTX 45.00
+6.7%
Radeon 8060S 42.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN RTX 18858
+6.7%
Radeon 8060S 17677

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

TITAN RTX 49602
+21.8%
Radeon 8060S 40732

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

TITAN RTX 99561
+2.6%
Radeon 8060S 96996

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

TITAN RTX 35884
+29.7%
Radeon 8060S 27659

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

TITAN RTX 177234
+8%
Radeon 8060S 164040

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

TITAN RTX 537413
Radeon 8060S 581927
+8.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD161
+51.9%
106
−51.9%
1440p102
+78.9%
57
−78.9%
4K73
+103%
36
−103%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.52no data
1440p24.50no data
4K34.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 353
+52.8%
230−240
−52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−27.8%
100−110
+27.8%
God of War 182
+55.6%
117
−55.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 163
+16.4%
140−150
−16.4%
Counter-Strike 2 342
+59.1%
215
−59.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−27.8%
100−110
+27.8%
Far Cry 5 165
+55.7%
106
−55.7%
Fortnite 169
−7.7%
180−190
+7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 187
+14%
160−170
−14%
Forza Horizon 5 168
−19.6%
201
+19.6%
God of War 155
+61.5%
96
−61.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 202
+23.9%
160−170
−23.9%
Valorant 348
+43.8%
240−250
−43.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 164
+17.1%
140−150
−17.1%
Counter-Strike 2 270
+148%
109
−148%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−27.8%
100−110
+27.8%
Dota 2 155
+10.7%
140−150
−10.7%
Far Cry 5 156
+50%
104
−50%
Fortnite 176
−3.4%
180−190
+3.4%
Forza Horizon 4 186
+13.4%
160−170
−13.4%
Forza Horizon 5 153
−19%
182
+19%
God of War 129
+69.7%
76
−69.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+19.7%
127
−19.7%
Metro Exodus 134
+30.1%
100−110
−30.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 163
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 267
+22.5%
218
−22.5%
Valorant 336
+38.8%
240−250
−38.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160
+14.3%
140−150
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
−29.5%
100−110
+29.5%
Dota 2 148
+13.8%
130−140
−13.8%
Far Cry 5 146
+50.5%
97
−50.5%
Forza Horizon 4 175
+6.7%
160−170
−6.7%
God of War 96
+95.9%
49
−95.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 136
−19.9%
160−170
+19.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+21.9%
114
−21.9%
Valorant 236
+7.3%
220−230
−7.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 134
−35.8%
180−190
+35.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 157
+121%
71
−121%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+7.4%
290−300
−7.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 114
+62.9%
70
−62.9%
Metro Exodus 85
+32.8%
60−65
−32.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+9.4%
160−170
−9.4%
Valorant 307
+12.9%
270−280
−12.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+5.6%
100−110
−5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+29.4%
50−55
−29.4%
Far Cry 5 134
+50.6%
89
−50.6%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+25.6%
120−130
−25.6%
God of War 83
+108%
40
−108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+8.2%
85
−8.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+7.8%
110−120
−7.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45
+25%
36
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+76.3%
76
−76.3%
Metro Exodus 55
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+80.7%
57
−80.7%
Valorant 300
+16.3%
250−260
−16.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 97
+42.6%
65−70
−42.6%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Dota 2 146
+12.3%
130−140
−12.3%
Far Cry 5 80
+63.3%
49
−63.3%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+35.7%
80−85
−35.7%
God of War 55
+57.1%
35
−57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 96
+57.4%
60−65
−57.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 74
+27.6%
55−60
−27.6%

This is how TITAN RTX and Radeon 8060S compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 52% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 79% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 103% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the TITAN RTX is 148% faster.
  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Epic Preset, the Radeon 8060S is 36% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is ahead in 47 tests (80%)
  • Radeon 8060S is ahead in 10 tests (17%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.00 42.18
Recency 18 December 2018 6 January 2025
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 55 Watt

TITAN RTX has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 8060S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 409.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between TITAN RTX and Radeon 8060S.

Be aware that TITAN RTX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 8060S is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 852 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 40 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN RTX or Radeon 8060S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.