Arc A350M vs T600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T600 with Arc A350M, including specs and performance data.

T600
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 40 Watt
16.80
+14.6%

T600 outperforms Arc A350M by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking323357
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.7840.18
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU117DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed735 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1335 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate53.4055.20
Floating-point processing power1.709 TFLOPS1.766 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs4048
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T600 16.80
+14.6%
Arc A350M 14.66

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T600 8694
Arc A350M 10730
+23.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T600 344838
+1012%
Arc A350M 31023

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T600 6552
Arc A350M 7147
+9.1%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T600 40917
+12.7%
Arc A350M 36315

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD53
+51.4%
35
−51.4%
1440p25
+47.1%
17
−47.1%
4K20
+122%
9
−122%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−3.8%
27
+3.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+15.2%
30−35
−15.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−25%
35
+25%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+19.6%
45−50
−19.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+17.2%
27−30
−17.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+36.8%
19
−36.8%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+18.2%
30−35
−18.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+15.4%
35−40
−15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+15.1%
90−95
−15.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+13.7%
70−75
−13.7%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+18.8%
45−50
−18.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+17.9%
35−40
−17.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+19.6%
45−50
−19.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+9.2%
75−80
−9.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+15.2%
30−35
−15.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+40%
20
−40%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+19.6%
45−50
−19.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+17.2%
27−30
−17.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+62.5%
16
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+18.2%
30−35
−18.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+15.4%
35−40
−15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+15.1%
90−95
−15.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+13.7%
70−75
−13.7%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+18.8%
45−50
−18.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+17.9%
35−40
−17.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
−3.9%
53
+3.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+14.7%
30−35
−14.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+9.2%
75−80
−9.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+15.2%
30−35
−15.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+75%
16
−75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+17.2%
27−30
−17.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+117%
12
−117%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+18.2%
30−35
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+15.1%
90−95
−15.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 39
−87.2%
70−75
+87.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45
+0%
45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+42.1%
19
−42.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+9.2%
75−80
−9.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+17.9%
35−40
−17.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+18.2%
21−24
−18.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+23.3%
70−75
−23.3%
Hitman 3 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+20%
24−27
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
−15.6%
37
+15.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+15.9%
85−90
−15.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Hitman 3 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+19.7%
70−75
−19.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+6.7%
15
−6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−5.6%
19
+5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%

This is how T600 and Arc A350M compete in popular games:

  • T600 is 51% faster in 1080p
  • T600 is 47% faster in 1440p
  • T600 is 122% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T600 is 117% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A350M is 87% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T600 is ahead in 63 tests (88%)
  • Arc A350M is ahead in 7 tests (10%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.80 14.66
Recency 6 May 2021 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 25 Watt

T600 has a 14.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc A350M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A350M in performance tests.

Be aware that T600 is a workstation card while Arc A350M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T600
T600
Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 682 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 57 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.