Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking260not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameno dataVega 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)1 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Current priceno data$299

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244096
Core clock speed855 MHz1156 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz1247 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data319.2
Floating-point performanceno data10,215 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on T1200 Mobile and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data152 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data409.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2021 1 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 250 Watt

We couldn't decide between T1200 Mobile and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.