RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs T1000

Place in the ranking	286	19
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	27.30	23.86
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU117	AD103
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)	9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	7680
Core clock speed	1065 MHz	2070 MHz
Boost clock speed	1395 MHz	2580 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	210 Watt
Texture fill rate	78.12	619.2
Floating-point processing power	2.5 TFLOPS	39.63 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	80
TMUs	56	240
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	245 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 18.52

RTX 4500 Ada Generation 67.99
+267%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 7631

RTX 4500 Ada Generation 28019
+267%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

T1000 37665

RTX 4500 Ada Generation 197083
+423%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

T1000 35033

RTX 4500 Ada Generation 176517
+404%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−262%

210−220
+262%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

45
−256%

160−170

+256%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −265%	230−240 +265%
Counter-Strike 2	34 −253%	120−130 +253%
Forza Horizon 4	87 −245%	300−310 +245%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −258%	190−200 +258%
Metro Exodus	62 −255%	220−230 +255%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −248%	160−170 +248%
Valorant	80−85 −263%	290−300 +263%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −265%	230−240 +265%
Counter-Strike 2	28 −257%	100−105 +257%
Dota 2	77 −264%	280−290 +264%
Far Cry 5	130 −246%	450−500 +246%
Fortnite	100−110 −233%	350−400 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	69 −262%	250−260 +262%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −258%	190−200 +258%
Grand Theft Auto V	77 −264%	280−290 +264%
Metro Exodus	42 −257%	150−160 +257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −236%	450−500 +236%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −248%	160−170 +248%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −255%	220−230 +255%
Valorant	80−85 −263%	290−300 +263%
World of Tanks	230−240 −248%	800−850 +248%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −265%	230−240 +265%
Counter-Strike 2	24 −254%	85−90 +254%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −264%	240−250 +264%
Forza Horizon 4	60 −267%	220−230 +267%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −258%	190−200 +258%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −236%	450−500 +236%
Valorant	80−85 −263%	290−300 +263%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 −255%	110−120 +255%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −244%	110−120 +244%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −261%	65−70 +261%
World of Tanks	130−140 −233%	450−500 +233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −250%	140−150 +250%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −258%	190−200 +258%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −253%	180−190 +253%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −255%	110−120 +255%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −256%	160−170 +256%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −257%	100−105 +257%
Valorant	50−55 −253%	180−190 +253%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Dota 2	30−35 −253%	120−130 +253%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −253%	120−130 +253%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 −267%	220−230 +267%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −246%	45−50 +246%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −253%	120−130 +253%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −250%	70−75 +250%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −265%	95−100 +265%
Fortnite	24−27 −254%	85−90 +254%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −267%	110−120 +267%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
Valorant	24−27 −254%	85−90 +254%

This is how T1000 and RTX 4500 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 4500 Ada Generation is 262% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.52	67.99
Recency	6 May 2021	9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	210 Watt

T1000 has 320% lower power consumption.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 267.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the T1000 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.