Radeon Pro 5500M vs STG

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.90
Architectureno dataRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameNV1Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date30 September 1995 (29 years ago)13 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed75 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors1 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08139.2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.454 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs196

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeFPMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed50 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth400.0 MB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 1995 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 500 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 85 Watt

STG has 4150% lower power consumption.

Pro 5500M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 24 years, a 819100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 7042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between STG and Radeon Pro 5500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that STG is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA STG
STG
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 5 votes

Rate STG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 259 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.