Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Riva TNT2 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated658
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.50
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV5 B6Coffee Lake GT3e
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 1999 (25 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed143 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors15 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology250 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.2950.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs26
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xRing Bus
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed167 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2.672 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 1999 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 250 nm 14 nm

Iris Plus Graphics 645 has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva TNT2 PRO and Iris Plus Graphics 645. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva TNT2 PRO
Riva TNT2 PRO
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 24 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 116 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.