RTX A5000 Mobile vs Riva 128

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated95
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.43
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV3GA104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 April 1997 (27 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed100 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistors4 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1302.4
Floating-point processing powerno data19.35 TFLOPS
ROPs196
TMUs1192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed100 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.6 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1997 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 150 Watt

Riva 128 has 3650% lower power consumption.

RTX A5000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 24 years, a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva 128 and RTX A5000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva 128 is a desktop card while RTX A5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
RTX A5000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 39 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 54 votes

Rate RTX A5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.