GRID M60-2Q vs Riva 128

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated379
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data4.14
Architectureno dataMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNV3GM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 1997 (27 years ago)30 August 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed100 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1178 MHz
Number of transistors4 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1150.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.825 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs1128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed100 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.6 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1997 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 225 Watt

Riva 128 has 5525% lower power consumption.

GRID M60-2Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva 128 and GRID M60-2Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva 128 is a desktop card while GRID M60-2Q is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128
NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
GRID M60-2Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 38 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate GRID M60-2Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.