A800 PCIe 80 GB vs Riva 128 PCI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV3GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 1997 (27 years ago)8 November 2022 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6912
Core clock speed100 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors4 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1609.1
Floating-point processing powerno data19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs1160
TMUs1432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 MB80 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed100 MHz1512 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.6 GB/s1,935 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.0N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL1.0N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1997 8 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 80 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 250 Watt

Riva 128 PCI has 6150% lower power consumption.

A800 PCIe 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 25 years, a 2047900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva 128 PCI and A800 PCIe 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva 128 PCI is a desktop card while A800 PCIe 80 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva 128 PCI
Riva 128 PCI
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
A800 PCIe 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate Riva 128 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate A800 PCIe 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.