UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake) vs Raven
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | no data |
| GPU code name | Raven | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | no data |
| Current price | $127 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 704 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
We couldn't decide between Raven and UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Raven is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake) is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
