GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs ATI Rage PRO Turbo AGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated270
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Power efficiencyno data28.12
ArchitectureRage 3 (1997−1998)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRage 3 TurboTU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 1997 (27 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed75 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors8 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.0895.04
Floating-point processing powerno data3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed75 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth600.0 MB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 1997 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has an age advantage of 23 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2816.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage PRO Turbo AGP and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rage PRO Turbo AGP is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Rage PRO Turbo AGP
Rage PRO Turbo AGP
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 34 votes

Rate Rage PRO Turbo AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1643 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.