Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics vs ATI Rage Fury MAXX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRage 4Spectre Lite
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 1999 (25 years ago)17 February 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed125 MHz554 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors8 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data90 Watt
Texture fill rate0.2513.30
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4255 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed143 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.144 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 1999 17 February 2014
Chip lithography 250 nm 28 nm

R7 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage Fury MAXX and Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rage Fury MAXX is a desktop card while Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Rage Fury MAXX
Rage Fury MAXX
AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Rage Fury MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.