Radeon Graphics 320SP vs ATI Rage 128 GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRage 4Renoir
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 August 1998 (26 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed80 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1400 MHz
Number of transistors8 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1628.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.896 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed60 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth960.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 1998 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 250 nm 7 nm

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 21 year, and a 3471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage 128 GL and Radeon Graphics 320SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rage 128 GL is a workstation card while Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Rage 128 GL
Rage 128 GL
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Rage 128 GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.