NV34 A1 vs Radeon Xpress X1270
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | no data | Rankine (2003−2005) |
GPU code name | M690T | NV34 A1 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 February 2007 (17 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | no data |
Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 45 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 150 nm |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | no data |
Shared memory | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | no data | 9.0a |
OpenGL | no data | 1.5 (2.1) |
OpenCL | no data | N/A |
Vulkan | no data | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 80 nm | 150 nm |
We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress X1270 and NV34 A1. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Xpress X1270 is a notebook card while NV34 A1 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.