ATI Radeon X1600 vs ATI Xpress 200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Xpress 200M with Radeon X1600, including specs and performance data.

ATI Xpress 200M
2005
0.05

ATI X1600 outperforms ATI Xpress 200M by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15221485
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.34
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameRC410RV516
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2005 (20 years ago)2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6no data
Core clock speed336 MHz635 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHzno data
Number of transistors107 million105 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data27 Watt
Texture fill rate0.672.540
ROPs24
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI Xpress 200M 0.05
ATI X1600 0.12
+140%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Xpress 200M 22
ATI X1600 49
+123%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
God of War 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
God of War 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Valorant 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
God of War 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Valorant 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
God of War 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Valorant 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Valorant 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.05 0.12
Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm

ATI X1600 has a 140% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon X1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 200M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 200M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1600 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Radeon Xpress 200M
ATI Radeon X1600
Radeon X1600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 46 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 83 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 200M or Radeon X1600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.