GeForce FX 5100 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1560
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameCedar TrailNV34 A1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2011 (14 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4no data
Core clock speedno data200 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data45 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.8
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data9.0a
OpenGLno data1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 6 March 2003
Chip lithography 32 nm 150 nm

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 368.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 and GeForce FX 5100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5100 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5100
GeForce FX 5100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 28 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 50 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 or GeForce FX 5100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.