ATI 3D Rage vs ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | R300 (2005−2008) | Mach (1992−1997) |
| GPU code name | RC410 | Mach64 GT |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 18 February 2005 (19 years ago) | 1 April 1996 (28 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 2 MHz | 44 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 350 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 107 million | 5 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 500 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 0.67 | 0.04 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCI |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | EDO |
| Maximum RAM amount | 0 MB | 2 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 57 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 456.0 MB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0 (9_0) | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | N/A |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 February 2005 | 1 April 1996 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 500 nm |
ATI Xpress 200M has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 284.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 200M and 3D Rage. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Xpress 200M is a notebook card while 3D Rage is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
