Quadro T1200 Mobile vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Xpress 1250 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
T1200 Mobile outperforms Xpress 1250 by a whopping 17070% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1510 | 347 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 73.91 |
| Architecture | R400 (2004−2008) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | RS690 | TU117 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 February 2007 (18 years ago) | 12 April 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | 1425 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 120 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 18 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.600 | 91.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 2.918 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 32 |
| TMUs | 4 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0b (9_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 58 |
| 1440p | -0−1 | 33 |
| 4K | -0−1 | 81 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−2300%
|
70−75
+2300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−843%
|
65−70
+843%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−471%
|
130−140
+471%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−11
−2110%
|
220−230
+2110%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−1325%
|
114
+1325%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−2300%
|
70−75
+2300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−843%
|
65−70
+843%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−1320%
|
71
+1320%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−471%
|
130−140
+471%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−1238%
|
107
+1238%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−2300%
|
70−75
+2300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−843%
|
65−70
+843%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−640%
|
37
+640%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−16983%
|
4100−4150
+16983%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−14900%
|
300−310
+14900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−16900%
|
170−180
+16900%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Escape from Tarkov | 1−2
−3600%
|
35−40
+3600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−4300%
|
40−45
+4300%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−16900%
|
170−180
+16900%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−129%
|
30−35
+129%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−9800%
|
95−100
+9800%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−1600%
|
16−18
+1600%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−800%
|
18−20
+800%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65
+0%
|
65
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 59
+0%
|
59
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 71
+0%
|
71
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 56
+0%
|
56
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 37
+0%
|
37
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Valorant | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 41
+0%
|
41
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
4K
High
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 109
+0%
|
109
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 9800% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- T1200 Mobile performs better in 19 tests (38%)
- there's a draw in 31 tests (62%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.10 | 17.17 |
| Recency | 28 February 2007 | 12 April 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 12 nm |
T1200 Mobile has a 17070% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 1250 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1250 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
