ATI Radeon HD 4810 vs ATI Xpress X1250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated952
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.49
Architectureno dataTeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRS690MRV770
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2007 (18 years ago)28 May 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4640
Core clock speedno data625 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data956 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data95 Watt
Texture fill rateno data20.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data246 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data10.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2007 28 May 2009
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm

ATI HD 4810 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress X1250 and Radeon HD 4810. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress X1250 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4810 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress X1250
Radeon Xpress X1250
ATI Radeon HD 4810
Radeon HD 4810

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 17 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress X1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 26 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress X1250 or Radeon HD 4810, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.