Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1250

Place in the ranking	1501	490
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	R400 (2004−2008)	Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code name	RS690	Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	28 February 2007 (18 years ago)	14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4	4
Core clock speed	400 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	400 MHz	1950 MHz
Number of transistors	120 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	5 nm
Texture fill rate	1.600	no data
ROPs	4	no data
TMUs	4	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	no data
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0b (9_2)	12_2
OpenGL	2.0	no data
OpenCL	N/A	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −9400%	95−100 +9400%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −9400%	95−100 +9400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1567%	50 +1567%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
Valorant	24−27 −283%	90−95 +283%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	10−11 −9400%	950−1000 +9400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Dota 2	8−9 −9275%	750−800 +9275%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1200%	39 +1200%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −400%	24−27 +400%
Valorant	24−27 −283%	90−95 +283%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Dota 2	8−9 −9275%	750−800 +9275%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −900%	30 +900%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −8900%	450−500 +8900%
Valorant	24−27 −283%	90−95 +283%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −9400%	190−200 +9400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −4600%	45−50 +4600%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −2200%	21−24 +2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	14−16

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Valorant	1−2 −9400%	95−100 +9400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

−800%

9−10
+800%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

2−3
−9400%

190−200

+9400%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2

+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	11 +0%	11 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	13 +0%	13 +0%
Far Cry 5	24 +0%	24 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	15 +0%	15 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Fortnite	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 4600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) performs better in 20 tests (34%)
there's a draw in 39 tests (66%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.09	8.92
Recency	28 February 2007	14 December 2023
Chip lithography	80 nm	5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 9811.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 1250 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon Xpress 1250

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon Xpress 1250

GeForce Go 7300

Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)

Iris Xe Graphics G7

Radeon Xpress 1250

GeForce Go 6100

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600

RX 5700

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430

RTX 8000

ATI Mobility Radeon X1350

Voodoo5 5500 AGP

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400

Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M

H100 PCIe

ATI Mobility Radeon 7500

Volari 8300

NVIDIA GeForce 3 Go

RX 550X

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

RTX 2060 12 GB

AMD Radeon 530

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps

NVS 510M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 20 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3 17 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 1250 or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.