Quadro NVS 510M vs GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1204
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGP104G71
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date20 April 2017 (7 years ago)21 August 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1607 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate277.310.80
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6416
TMUs16024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth352.3 GB/s19.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2017 21 August 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 1080 11Gbps has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 510M, on the other hand, has 414.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps and Quadro NVS 510M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps is a desktop card while Quadro NVS 510M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps
GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
Quadro NVS 510M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 269 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 510M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.