Radeon RX Vega XT vs ATI Xpress 1100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRC410Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2006 (18 years ago)8 August 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64096
Core clock speed2 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1630 MHz
Manufacturing process technology110 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate0.6417.3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemoryHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthno data2048 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1890 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL2.04.5
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2006 8 August 2017
Chip lithography 110 nm 14 nm

RX Vega XT has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1100 and Radeon RX Vega XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1100 is a notebook card while Radeon RX Vega XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 1100
Radeon Xpress 1100
AMD Radeon RX Vega XT
Radeon RX Vega XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 26 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX Vega XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.