H100 PCIe vs ATI Radeon X800 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1411not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.25no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Hopper (2022−2023)
GPU code nameR423GH100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 May 2004 (20 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7296
Core clock speed475 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors160 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate5.700752.4
Floating-point processing powerno data24.08 TFLOPS
ROPs1224
TMUs12456
Tensor Coresno data456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount256 MB80 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s1,280 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL2.0N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2004 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 80 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 350 Watt

ATI X800 PRO has 629.2% lower power consumption.

H100 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 31900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 PRO and H100 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 PRO is a desktop card while H100 PCIe is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 PRO
Radeon X800 PRO
NVIDIA H100 PCIe
H100 PCIe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 71 vote

Rate H100 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.