GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q vs ATI Radeon X800 GT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1376not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.38no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameR480AD106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 November 2005 (19 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed475 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1230 MHz
Number of transistors160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate5.700177.1
Floating-point processing powerno data11.34 TFLOPS
ROPs1248
TMUs12144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed493 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth31.55 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2005 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 4070 Max-Q has an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 3150% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 GT and GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 GT is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 GT
Radeon X800 GT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 9 votes

Rate Radeon X800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 41 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.