Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs ATI Radeon X700 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1406not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.41no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameRV410Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 September 2004 (20 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed425 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1800 MHz
Number of transistors120 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate3.40043.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.382 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed430 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth13.76 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 110 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 28 Watt

Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile has an age advantage of 19 years, a 1000% more advanced lithography process, and 17.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X700 PRO and Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X700 PRO is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X700 PRO
Radeon X700 PRO
Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 48EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon X700 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X700 PRO or Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.